<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Rule Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/</link>
	<description>Outside Austin, But Terribly Well Connected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:34:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye on Williamson &#187; Bipartisanship And Making History</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-2274</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye on Williamson &#187; Bipartisanship And Making History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 May 2006 16:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/#comment-2274</guid>
		<description>[...] There are a few things I would change in these paragraphs because we all know the first thing they did was limit the debate. Which, of course, is why amendments were given a fair shake because of the jiggered rules. I also like the way the bill gave cover to Republicans because of the &#8220;bad public policy&#8221; that was put into the bill. Only Republicans could justify putting bad public policy into a bill to give them political cover. What does that say about the people that vote Republican? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There are a few things I would change in these paragraphs because we all know the first thing they did was limit the debate. Which, of course, is why amendments were given a fair shake because of the jiggered rules. I also like the way the bill gave cover to Republicans because of the &#8220;bad public policy&#8221; that was put into the bill. Only Republicans could justify putting bad public policy into a bill to give them political cover. What does that say about the people that vote Republican? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilson</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/comment-page-1/#comment-2049</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/04/22/the-rule-changes/#comment-2049</guid>
		<description>Kevin Bailey (D) is also on the &#039;yes&#039; side of the first vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Bailey (D) is also on the &#8216;yes&#8217; side of the first vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
