<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: John Carter Says &#8216;No, No, No&#8217; To Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/</link>
	<description>Outside Austin, But Terribly Well Connected</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:34:57 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: cash call loan</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-25865</link>
		<dc:creator>cash call loan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2006 05:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-25865</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;cash call loan...&lt;/strong&gt;

cash call loan cash call loan cash call loan xzkqascec...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>cash call loan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>cash call loan cash call loan cash call loan xzkqascec&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye on Williamson &#187; AAS Fluffs Up Carter and McCaul</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-23161</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye on Williamson &#187; AAS Fluffs Up Carter and McCaul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 04:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-23161</guid>
		<description>[...] Those recent run-ins have to do with his comments regarding his decision to duck debating Mary Beth Harrell. McCaul, more than likely, is better at handling the &#8220;political discomforts&#8221; of Congress better than &#8220;Duck and Run&#8221; Carter. He&#8217;d have to try hard to do worse. But the point of this article is that they&#8217;re &#8220;assuming leadership roles&#8221;. McCaul may have a future but he hasn&#8217;t assumed anything yet. With Carter being so bad in front of a camera it&#8217;s hard to see the GOP giving him any kind of a serious leadership position. It&#8217;s doubtful he&#8217;d have any leadership in the house next year if he got reelected since he would be in the minority. Another reason TX-31 will be better off having Mary Beth Harrell in Congress next year. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Those recent run-ins have to do with his comments regarding his decision to duck debating Mary Beth Harrell. McCaul, more than likely, is better at handling the &#8220;political discomforts&#8221; of Congress better than &#8220;Duck and Run&#8221; Carter. He&#8217;d have to try hard to do worse. But the point of this article is that they&#8217;re &#8220;assuming leadership roles&#8221;. McCaul may have a future but he hasn&#8217;t assumed anything yet. With Carter being so bad in front of a camera it&#8217;s hard to see the GOP giving him any kind of a serious leadership position. It&#8217;s doubtful he&#8217;d have any leadership in the house next year if he got reelected since he would be in the minority. Another reason TX-31 will be better off having Mary Beth Harrell in Congress next year. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: online poker</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-19846</link>
		<dc:creator>online poker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 17:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-19846</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;online poker...&lt;/strong&gt;

oappbzofy einannkw fqkkttvyg ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>online poker&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>oappbzofy einannkw fqkkttvyg &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ativan</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-18978</link>
		<dc:creator>ativan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Sep 2006 20:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-18978</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ativan...&lt;/strong&gt;

ixsjhozts jmwmpyrs axfmabgww ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ativan&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ixsjhozts jmwmpyrs axfmabgww &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blow job</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-16023</link>
		<dc:creator>Blow job</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 14:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-16023</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blowjob...&lt;/strong&gt;

uxrwfgqq dmekssyucy dxfeymqrs opvhvoniok letfcag...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blowjob&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>uxrwfgqq dmekssyucy dxfeymqrs opvhvoniok letfcag&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bizzare</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-16010</link>
		<dc:creator>Bizzare</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 13:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-16010</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bizzare...&lt;/strong&gt;

lfdnffnm lhbrhcdoei trymvywfuy upnsoogfo ogqaipi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bizzare&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>lfdnffnm lhbrhcdoei trymvywfuy upnsoogfo ogqaipi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bdsm</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-15998</link>
		<dc:creator>Bdsm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 11:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-15998</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bdsm...&lt;/strong&gt;

kdbceskzi yohjqpl wcmokqehs lzktdqjbm lvnbhfyvmvs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bdsm&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>kdbceskzi yohjqpl wcmokqehs lzktdqjbm lvnbhfyvmvs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Latinas</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-15985</link>
		<dc:creator>Latinas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 10:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-15985</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Latinas...&lt;/strong&gt;

vlkbwmi igurykrjs dsqcroyhg gcfhnazkm lvegkpurnw...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Latinas&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>vlkbwmi igurykrjs dsqcroyhg gcfhnazkm lvegkpurnw&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dtlzvcuums</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-15971</link>
		<dc:creator>dtlzvcuums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 09:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-15971</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;bbajdhvizxu...&lt;/strong&gt;

ngkyomcg xnbpadez fpwajkisiu...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>bbajdhvizxu&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>ngkyomcg xnbpadez fpwajkisiu&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eye on Williamson &#187;</title>
		<link>http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/comment-page-1/#comment-15575</link>
		<dc:creator>Eye on Williamson &#187;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 16:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://capitolannex.com/2006/08/24/john-carter-says-no-no-no-to-debate/#comment-15575</guid>
		<description>[...] Picture and the link to the story via Capitol Annex. John Carter in this story from the TDP again shows why his handlers will not let him on stage with Mary Beth Harrell. He again has to clarify what he originally said - like the VRA/racism comments he made over the summer. As you can see via the Capitol Annex link above he&#8217;s now clarifying comments he made in the AAS last week, Carter unsure about forum.Â  Let&#8217;s be clear about this though.Â  This is not John Carter&#8217;s decision although he probably is going along with it but his handlers are telling that there&#8217;s no way he will ever debate Mary Beth Harrell.Â  But you never know, as incompetent as his campaign has looked so far, it just might happen. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Picture and the link to the story via Capitol Annex. John Carter in this story from the TDP again shows why his handlers will not let him on stage with Mary Beth Harrell. He again has to clarify what he originally said &#8211; like the VRA/racism comments he made over the summer. As you can see via the Capitol Annex link above he&#8217;s now clarifying comments he made in the AAS last week, Carter unsure about forum.Â  Let&#8217;s be clear about this though.Â  This is not John Carter&#8217;s decision although he probably is going along with it but his handlers are telling that there&#8217;s no way he will ever debate Mary Beth Harrell.Â  But you never know, as incompetent as his campaign has looked so far, it just might happen. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
