Suspending Constitution Not Substantive Enough For Two Third’s Rule?
By Vince Leibowitz on Feb 14, 2007 in 80th Legislature      
Tweet This Post  
Evidently, suspending the Texas Constitution isn’t substantive enough to deserve the protection of the two-thirds rule. Via QR:
Dewhurst rules resolution busting budget cap is non-substantive and therefore not subject to 2/3s rule
The Senate passed its spending cap resolution this afternoon but the larger question coming out of today’s action is this: Did Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst in his zeal to act quickly on a spending cap put another nail in the coffin of the two-thirds rule?
After working to round up the 21 votes needed to pass a constitutional amendment, Dewhurst instead ruled from the dais that a spending cap resolution submitted by Sen. Steve Ogden (R-Bryan) could bypass the committee process and be subject only to a straight up majority floor vote.
During a lengthy parliamentary inquiry from Sen. Leticia Van de Putte (D-San Antonio), Dewhurst said he considered the Ogden resolution “non-substantive,” which allowed for the lower vote threshold. Van de Putte questioned how a vote to override a provision in the Texas Constitution could be non-substantive.
Amazing.
Tweet This Post
Ping This Post






































Comments
Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
You must be logged in to post a comment.