ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT


Kucinich Sues To Get On Texas Ballot Claiming “Loyalty Oath” Unlawful

By Vince Leibowitz  on Jan 3, 2008 in 2008 Presidential Race       [Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post  




I haven’t seen this reported anywhere except on the Houston Chronicle’s Texas politics blog, but it does explain the strange absence of Dennis Kucinich from the 2008 Democratic Primary Ballot in Texas, given the number of his supporters who were quite vocal at the 2004 convention:

State Democratic Party spokeswoman Amber Moon said the party didn’t accept presidential hopeful Dennis Kucinich’s filing to be on the party ballot because he had altered the oath that that is on the application.

The oath, in part, requires a presidential candidate to pledge to support the Democratic nominee, “whoever that shall be.”

Kucinich scratched through that part.

Moon said that Kucinich’s campaign, when contacted, indicated that he would sign it on the condition that the nominee pledge not to use war as part of foreign relations.

Moon said the chairman doesn’t have authority to allow such a change, since the application is approved by the State Democratic Executive Committee and the Democratic National Committee. She said Kucinich didn’t resubmit his filing by the deadline.

“We want to open the political process to as many people as possible. … but we also have to follow the party rules,” Moon said.

But that’s not the end of it.

Kucinich, joined by supporter Willie Nelson, went to federal district court in Austin to challenge the requirement that candidates sign what the legal complaint calls “a loyalty oath.”

I’m just guessing here, but if the “oath” is unique to Texas (and I don’t know if it is), then it probably dates back to the days when Alan Shivers was splintering the Democratic Party for Eisenhower over the Tidelands issue.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post   [Post to Ping.fm] Ping This Post







Stay up-to-date wherever life takes you. Read my blog on Amazon Kindle.



Comments

No Responses to “Kucinich Sues To Get On Texas Ballot Claiming “Loyalty Oath” Unlawful”

  1. BigBark | Home on January 3rd, 2008 10:48 am

    links from TechnoratiKucinich Sues To Get On Texas Ballot Claiming “Loyalty Oath” UnlawfulSubmitted by: CapitolAnnex on 1/3/08 via feed from Capitol Annex I haven’t seen this reported anywhere except on the Houston Chronicle’s Texas politics blog , but it does explain the strange absence of Dennis Kucinich from the 2008 Democratic

  2. The Seminal :: Independent Media and Politics on January 7th, 2008 10:36 pm

    links from Technoratito discuss an independent way for the Federal government. Highlighting this event was Michael Bloomberg, who is gettting oh-so-close to throwing his hat into the race to the White House. You can watch the event via C-SPAN. My boy Kucinichsues to get on the Texas ballotafter claiming that a “Loyal Oath” was unlawful. This said oath requires that all non-nominated presidential candidates from the Party unequivocally support the Democratic nominee. Sounds like a load of shit to me, too.

  3. Jon Swift on January 10th, 2008 1:10 am

    links from Technoratithrough for the past few days.” I think this is the kind of reaching across the political divide that Barack Obama is talking about. Speaking of Obama, Archpundit has come to the conclusion that he was wrong and Obama was right. Vince Leibowitz atCapitol Annexreports that Dennis Kucinich is being kept off the Texas ballot because he refuses to sign a loyalty oath. Kevin Hayden of American Street has compiled a list of the Top 100 Liberal and Reasonable Conservative Blogs. Take a look at who comes in at

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Readers who viewed this page, also viewed:

  • N/A